In The News
Homeland Security, FBI Can’t Get Story Straight on Screening Syrian Refugees
By Patrick Poole, PJ Media
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told USA Today yesterday that an increased wave of Syrian refugees that will be admitted into the U.S. in the coming year will be subjected to “extensive thorough background checks.” But just last week testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, FBI Director James Comey admitted that their databases on Syria are very limited and that screening the refugees “will be challenging.”
Johnson’s comments were made in an interview with USA Today reporter Susan Page posted on the newspaper’s website yesterday.
When asked about criticisms made by GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump about the administration’s immigration policies and concerns that ISIS may embed themselves among Syrian refugees as a “Trojan horse,” Johnson replied:
Well in terms of the level of effort of security review that we will apply and we have applied it will be and it is extensive. Both law enforcement and homeland security have improved the process from the days when we admitted a lot of Iraqi refugees. We now do a better job of connecting the dots, consulting all the right databases and systems that we have available to us, and the refugee review process is probably one of the most if not the most extensive thorough background checks that someone seeking to enter this country goes through. Now we’ve made this commitment for 10,000 Syrian refugees in FY2016. It is a commitment that the United States as a global leader should and will meet.
So Johnson says that the screening process has been improved following the wave of Iraqi refugees in the last decade, and that they have all the right databases and systems, and that the Syrian refugees will undergo the most extensive and thorough background checks.
And yet just last week FBI Director Comey was saying exactly the opposite.
During a House Judiciary Hearing last Thursday, Comey was asked by Rep. Louie Gohmert about the database the U.S. government maintained to screen Iraqi refugees, including an IED fingerprint database, in addition to other intelligence obtained by U.S. forces and the Iraqi government.
Despite the extensive database screening Iraqi refugees, U.S. authorities have admitted that possibly dozens of terrorists were admitted into the U.S. under that program, including two Iraqi terrorists living in Bowling Green, Kentucky, who were convicted of attempting to send weapons and money to Iraqi terrorists.
When asked further about the nature of intelligence available to screen Syrian refugees, Comey admitted contrary to Secretary Johnson that the Iraqi database was much more extensive than anything they have for Syria.
Rep. Gohmert then pressed further about the ability to screen refugees:
Gohmert: Well without a good fingerprint database, without good identification, how can you be sure that anyone is who they say they are if they don’t have fingerprints to go against…?
Comey: The only thing we can query is information that we have. So, if we have no information on someone, they’ve never crossed our radar screen, they’ve never been a ripple in the pond, there will be no record of them there and so it will be challenging.
The exchange between Rep. Gohmert and Director Comey on the Syrian refugee issue can be seen ~2:05 in the video below:
The contrast between Johnson’s confidence and Comey’s concern about the ability to screen the coming influx of Syrian refugees is striking.
The issue becomes more pointed since the White House announced last month that it will admit 10,000 Syrian refugees in the new fiscal year, more than five times that admitted this year.
In making that announcement, White House spokesman Josh Earnest touted the databases that FBI Director Comey said are inferior for screening Syrian refugees than previously screening Iraqi refugees:
Refugees go through the most robust security process of anybody who’s contemplating travel to the United States. Refugees have to be screened by the National Counter Terrorism Center, by the F.B.I. Terrorist Screening Center. They go through databases that are maintained by D.H.S., the Department of Defense and the intelligence community. There is biographical and biometric information that is collected about these individuals.
So in justifying the dramatic increase in Syrian refugees the administration appeals to screening databases that when pushed they have to admit are inadequate for screening out terrorists.
Meanwhile, Secretary of State John Kerry has announced that the U.S. will accept 85,000 refugees overall in 2016 and 100,000 in 2017, up from 70,000 in the current year.
Congressional Democrats have sent a letter to Obama asking him to admit another 65,000 Syrian refugees, and former Obama and Bush officials have asked that he authorize an additional 100,000 Syrian refugees over and above the 70,000 worldwide ceiling for the current year.